Reflecting on Promises and Payments

Is Able entitled to payment based on Baker's promise?

a. True
b. False

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Because Able helped Baker in preparing and filing the complaint and summons for a lawsuit against Chuck, and Baker promised to pay $500 to Able for this assistance.

Reflecting on the situation presented, it is clear that Able is entitled to payment from Baker. The promise made by Baker to pay Able $500 was based on the assistance provided by Able in preparing and filing the complaint and summons for the lawsuit against Chuck. This promise constitutes a valid agreement between the two parties.

When Baker recently informed Able about the agreement and confirmed the payment, Able rightfully agreed to the terms. However, despite Able's agreement, Baker has not fulfilled the payment obligation. This non-payment puts Baker in breach of the agreement, and Able has the right to enforce the promise in court.

It is essential to honor commitments and promises made in any agreement. In this case, Able's entitlement to the payment is valid and enforceable. The legal recourse available to Able demonstrates the importance of upholding agreements and fulfilling financial obligations in a transparent and fair manner.