The Conflict Between the New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan

About the Conflict:

The New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan were two proposals presented during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that laid the foundation for the structure of the United States government. The primary conflict between the two plans was centered around how representation in the legislative branch should be determined.

New Jersey Plan vs. Virginia Plan:

The New Jersey Plan, put forward by William Paterson, advocated for equal representation of all states in the legislative branch. This meant that each state would have an equal voice in government, regardless of its population size. On the other hand, the Virginia Plan, proposed by James Madison, suggested that representation should be based on population. This would give larger states more influence in the national legislature compared to smaller states.

Impact on Smaller and Larger States:

Smaller states would be more inclined towards the New Jersey Plan as it would ensure that their interests are not overshadowed by larger states with higher populations. Equal representation would give them a fair chance to have their voices heard in the government. On the contrary, larger states would prefer the Virginia Plan, arguing that their larger population should give them a greater say in the decision-making process.

In conclusion, the conflict between the New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan fundamentally revolves around how representation in the legislative branch should be structured. While smaller states would benefit from equal representation, larger states would push for a system based on population to ensure their interests are adequately represented.